Humphreys has unjustly manipulated e. There would be no change over time in a steady state mode. As further discussed below, Dr. Without detailed chemical and microscopic studies, feldspars and quartz in a light-colored gneiss can readily appear "igneous" and "unaltered" to the naked eye. Just because his invalid equations and inaccurate data happened to spit out a meaningless number that he likes 6,Dr. If so, the volume of this biotite feature is not times the volume of Humphreys et al. Humphreys' Q 0 value is too small.
Humphreys should stop picking and choosing from the obviously questionable data in Gentry et al.
Dr. Humphreys' Young-Earth Helium Diffusion "Dates"
This report has been replaced by more thorough studies by Laughlin et al. RATE's cherry picking and shoehorning of scientific data is matched only by their blatant disregard for legitimate scientific study and the scientific method. Humphreys' untenable creation model and a good dose of superficial "God did it! Only a brief abstract of Magomedov is readily available in English:. After invoking all of these "factors of two" or other discrepancies in numerous situations, what makes Dr. Gentry's sample 6 from a depth of meters were "almost exactly the same. Humphreys and his allies fail to realize that the errors associated with their Q 0 value and the numerous other questions and errors associated with Dr.